The dashboard looks like this with a worksheet tab for each configuration.
Rubber State-of-Cure Calculator Dashboard. |
This section was added on 2/22/2014:
The implicit finite difference formulation is used to solve the for the temperatures in time and position. The implicit method is unconditionally stable in time, although this does not preclude using a small time step for improved accuracy. Progressively decreasing the time step until convergence is always good practice. The same is true for the spatial size. In this case the number of nodes. Any number of good references are available that describe the methodology including Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer by Incropera and DeWitt, 4th Edition.
This module assumes that the thermal properties (conductivity and specific heat) do not change over the temperature range and state-of-cure. It also assumes there is no significant additional heating from the curing kinetics.
The MS Excel Macro has been code signed with a 3rd party code signing certificate to allow higher macro security settings.
A version enabling a larger range of shapes is underway.
Have you tested the accuracy of this simulation against real world data?
ReplyDeleteI am trying to use this but do not understand how I determine when the component has reached T90.
We have some actual part data that we have roughly checked this against and it appears to be relatively close.
ReplyDeleteThe model has two basic calculation elements: 1) the transient heat transfer and 2) the state-of-cure. The heat transfer is primarily a subject of the thermal conductivity of the rubber. The model currently assumes it stays constant over the cure range. This is probably is the most uncertain portion of the model.
The cure calculation needs the Ts2 and Tc 90 values which usually are obtained from an MDR or ODR cure test.
what is FDM method that you solve T(x,t)?
ReplyDelete